The Haunted Mansion Talk

I have spoken about #ColdCaseConfession at some interesting venues, but none as interesting as the one I’m visiting on July 6, 2016. Don’t miss this opportunity to explore the former mansion of one of Johannesburg’s Randlords, a 40-room national monument, now believed to be haunted by the ghost of a flamboyant socialite.

The talk is being organised by the Rand Club, but not at its former home in the Joburg CBD. Instead, it’s taking place at the Northwards mansion in Parktown. The place has such a rich history – stretching back to 1904 – there are tours running through what has been described as a “historic landmark” in the city.

The mansion once belonged to the Dale Laces; John, a wealthy broker and his wife Josephine, who apparently rode around in a cart pulled by zebras, slept till noon, bathed in milk and had affairs with an English king (she was also rumoured to have been proposed to by Cecil John Rodes, who has done a great deal of #falling lately, although not in love). The house is believed to be haunted by Josephine, who died in 1937. Step on a certain part of the staircase and, legend has it, you’ll hear the rustling of her dress. Forget to straighten her portrait in the hall, and she’ll do it for you.


Over the past century the Northwards mansion has been sold and bought many times, including by the SABC. There were plans to demolish it and erect a television tower in its place. Not entirely unexpectedly, during the nine years the house was under SABC control, paintings and fittings were stolen and one employee even made off with the gate. “Sterling work” as Hlaudi Motsoeneng might say today.

There have been fires and extensive restorations, but the mansion stands and is the venue of my next talk. If you want to read more about the history of Northwards, click here. On the day, I will talk about my book using an audio presentation, so you will hear the voices of the main characters in the story. I will also talk about South Africa and its criminal justice system. There will be time for questions and you can also get a book signed.


Details of the talk are as follows:

Date: 6 July, 2016.

Time: 12pm

Venue: 21 Rock Ridge Road, Parktown

Cost: R230 (including lunch and drinks).

RSVP: / 011-870-4260

(Information used in this blog is contained in an article published on the City of Joburg’s website. Link provided above.)

A “Cold and Lonely Death”

The Betty Ketani trial is over. Four years after they were arrested (and a marathon 2-year trial later) Carrington Laughton and brothers Carel and David Ranger have been convicted and sentenced for murdering Ketani in May 1999. Ketani’s brother, Mankinki, was in court for the sentencing and as he walked out he quoted none other than Nelson Mandela: “It’s been a long walk to freedom”.

By freedom, the family means closure. With sentencing done, the family can move forward. Betty’s daughter Bulelwa can start looking for work again, knowing it won’t be disrupted by subpoenas to testify in Johannesburg. Ketani’s youngest daughter, Lusanda can focus on her school work again and on raising her young son. Mankinki can get back to running his little shop in Barkly East.

In the coming days, the family will return to Joburg to fetch Betty Ketani’s spirit and to escort it back home. In Queenstown, across the road from their house, Betty’s children will bury her, seventeen years after she first disappeared. When they need guidance or just someone to talk to, they will be able to visit her grave. It’s too late for this year’s Mother’s Day, but next year they will have a grave to gather at. A painful chapter in their lives has ended.

In court, for the first time, Judge Natvarial Ranchod gave his impressions of the crimes that had been committed and the manner in which Ketani was murdered. You can listen to it here:

Carrington Laughton has been sentenced to an effective 30 years behind bars. The Ranger brothers, who have already spent four years in jail, will have to spend another four each. They were convicted of culpable homicide and got away with lighter sentences.

It’s important to also remember that three other accused, Conway Brown, Paul Toft-Nielsen and Dirk Reinecke pleaded guilty and received more lenient sentences.

Laughton and the Rangers applied for leave to appeal their convictions (and, in Laughton’s case, his sentence) but were refused it by Judge Ranchod. They will now have to petition the Supreme Court of Appeal in Bloemfontein.

Prosecutors Herman Broodryk and Namika Kowlas, along with investigating officer Captain Gerhard Van Wyk, will now busy themselves with extradition applications for outstanding suspects who they believe should face justice.

Although the trial has ended, there are still missing pieces in the #ColdCase puzzle. And if a 3-page confession to a murder can be discovered lying under a carpet 12 years after the crime, then who knows what the future holds.

Judgment Day

February 17, 2016

Two years, to the day, after the trial began, Judge Natvarial Ranchod finished delivering his judgment. Carrington Laughton has been convicted of murder, kidnapping and attempted kidnapping. Carel and David Ranger were found guilty of kidnapping and Culpable Homicide. The three are to be sentenced in early May.

A court has now ruled the confession discovered under the carpet is genuine and was written by Laughton. Almost 17 years after Betty Ketani vanished without a trace, her family finally have closure.

Judge Ranchod found the state presented a “formidable case” against Laughton and the Rangers. The DNA tests and handwriting analysis, along with the evidence of the state’s 105A witnesses, all proved crucial. The court rejected Laughton’s testimony (and surprise alibi) as “false beyond reasonable doubt” and described him as a poor, evasive witness. The judge was not impressed with the defence’s DNA expert, who had made up his title, nor by Laughton’s friend Leon Rehrl. He noted that Conway Brown, Paul Toft-Nielson and Dirk Reinecke were hardly “angels”, but their evidence was corroborated.

Moments after the judgment was delivered, there were tears of joy and hugs outside the courtroom. Ketani’s eldest daughter Bulelwa and brother Mankinki had travelled from the Eastern Cape to witness the moment. They thanked prosecutors Herman Broodryk and Namika Kowlas, and detective Gerhard Van Wyk, for all their work. Bulelwa says they will now try and bring her mother’s spirit home.

Judgment Day

For more, see the following links from EWN:

Story 01

Story 02 

A Race Against Time…

With the clock ticking down towards the end of the court term, the trial is moving faster now. Carrington Laughton is virtually done presenting his case and the first of the Ranger brothers has testified. The judge is now reluctant to grant postponements, insisting that each court day be filled, even if it means knocking out the order a little.

After spending the equivalent of two weeks on the witness stand, Laughton called his witnesses. First, there was a DNA expert who challenged the findings of the International Commission on Missing Persons (ICMP), a world renowned DNA lab based in Bosnia. David Swanepoel argued that the forensic link established between the bones found in a shallow grave and Betty Ketani’s children is unreliable, especially in a criminal trial where the stakes are so much higher. He had a go at some of the chemicals used by the ICMP and testified that Ketani could still be excluded as the victim. The state questioned Swanepoel’s experience (he’s only been working for about five years) and level of qualifications (still studying towards a masters degree). Simply put, prosecutors argued: Are you really qualified to challenge our expert? The state’s witness who testified on behalf of the ICMP was Dr Thomas Parsons, who has a PHD in molecular biology (specialising in ancient DNA) and whose CV runs to over 20 pages, including the fact that at the time of testifying he led a team of over 80 scientists and had testified at The Hague. The ICMP, by the way, had expressed its own reservation at the results, saying they are not strong enough to be used without supporting evidence.

Laughton’s handwriting expert, Cecil Greenfield, on the other hand, was an absolute veteran with a lifetime of experience behind him. He testified about the reliability of handwriting evidence (to sum up: “treat it with caution, it’s subjective”), but mostly agreed with the findings of the state’s handwriting expert, policeman Marco Van der Hammen. Interestingly, Greenfield said he could find no evidence that the signatures on the confession were forged, except that the third one was slightly different to the first two (there are three pages and three signatures). He raised some questions about other aspects, like whether the third page was written with a different pen or at a different time. For the defense it was important to highlight the “anomalies”, feeding into the alleged conspiracy against Laughton.

One of Carrington’s friends, Leon Rehrl, also took the stand. His evidence supports Laughton’s claim that he is being framed. But I’d be surprised if this plays any major part in the outcome since Rehrl’s story is that (about 10 years ago) he had a conversation with someone, who had heard from someone else that there was an apparent plot to set Carrington up. There is no way to prove this, it wasn’t put to key state witnesses and Rehrl’s credibility is yet to be determined.

David Ranger, meanwhile, has given his evidence. His version aligns with Laughton’s, who claims they did go and pick up a woman at a hospital in Vereeniging, but that it was in 1995 and not in 1999. Laughton, and now David, who is a former policeman, say the woman was not Betty Ketani and was not being kidnapped, but instead was merely being driven to meet one of her family members. The problem for Ranger is that three years ago, he and his brother Carel signed bail affidavits that began with “During 1999…” and then spelt out this hospital trip. The statements were not only signed but read into the record and confirmed by them. David’s explanation now is that he was too stressed and angry to take it all in and should never have signed the statements or confirmed its contents. Prosecutor Herman Broodryk challenged him, saying David was a policeman with 17 years service who knows full well how important bail statements are. Not only that, he was also a trainer who taught others officers. We’ll have to wait and see what the court makes of this.

There are two weeks left before the end of the court term. It’s hoped that within that time both sides can finish presenting evidence, leaving only closing arguments and judgment.

Follow the trial: @alexeliseev / @ewnreporter

Victim or “Puppet Master”?

Carrington Laughton spent 13 days on the witness stand. There was far too much testimony for me to cover everything here, save to say that the fundamental dispute over who wrote the hidden confession remains firmly in place. Laughton didn’t move an inch from his claim that he is being framed for murder and that the confession, which was discovered (by pure chance) under a carpet three years ago, is a forgery.

The former private detective was an impressive witness. Prosecutor Herman Broodryk must have realised that he was not going to get him to surrender or admit to anything. Once, somewhere towards the end, Laughton told the court he felt tired. But when asked whether he was willing to continue, he fell straight back into his rhythm.

Most days were consumed by the details – dates, people, places, routes, documents, memories, sequences of events, a missing comma in the court record… Other days saw tense exchanges between prosecutor and accused. Broodryk searched for discrepancies and lies, finding weak spots and applying as much pressure as he could. He also worked on Laughton’s credibility. What was important to the state was all the questions that Laughton didn’t ask its witnesses or the statements that went unchallenged. This, Broodryk argued, showed that he had waited for the state to finish its case before creating a version, which was tailored to fit the evidence.

“All along, you did not have a version,” Broodryk charged. “You made up a version based on the state’s case. You have no defense…”

But Laughton stuck to his guns, arguing that his legal advice was to wait until he opened his case before presenting his version and alibi. He used words like “nonsensical” or “preposterous” to challenge the state’s case. He pushed back against Broodryk when he needed to, accusing him of asking unfair or vague questions.

And so the court has been left with two versions. One presented by Laughton, which shifts the entire time frame of events and has him in another city when the crime is committed. The other offered by the state, which paints him as the “puppet master” of the Betty Ketani kidnapping and murder in mid 1999. We’ll know which the court believes when judgment is delivered.

From here, the defense is calling its own expert witnesses to dispute the DNA and handwriting findings presented by the state. It will also call one of Laughton’s friends to support the allegation that a conspiracy was hatched against him.

Follow the case: @alexeliseev

Carrington Laughton Reveals his Cards

May 3, 2015

As far as evidence-in-chief goes, Carrington Laughton has proved himself to be an impressive witness. He is clearly familiar with the way a courtroom functions and is comfortable enough to speak directly to the judge or instruct his lawyer from inside the witness box. While testifying, Laughton picks his words carefully, shows off his powerful memory and dismisses the evidence against him as “ridiculous” or “completely untrue”. He never seems to run out of confidence.

The man accused of writing a confession at the heart of the “Cold Case” has spent three days giving his version. He is almost done and will now face cross examination. The next few days will define what kind of witness he will be remembered as. Laughton continues to deny that he wrote the letter and maintains he is being framed.

This is the first time the former private investigator has given a full version. He kept his cards close to his chest right up until his Section 174 application failed to keep him out of the witness box. As expected, Laughton has presented a comprehensive defence, complete with a 1995 diary and an incredible amount of detail – down to the colour of a suitcase he claims to have laid eyes on twenty years ago.

Carrington has presented a dramatically different timeline of key events in his life, which challenges the state’s case against him. He claims that at the time when Betty Ketani was kidnapped and killed (May 1999), he was spending his weeks in Cape Town on business. He has also tried to explain why his two co-accused, Carel and David Ranger, confessed (during their bail application) to pushing Betty Ketani out of a Vereeniging hospital in 1999. [You’ll recall that the state’s version is that Laughton and Conway Brown tried to kill Ketani on the side of a road but failed, which led to her being snatched from hospital and left to die in an old hollowed-out bus.] The Rangers claimed in their bail statements that they did help Laughton pick up a woman from hospital, but that she appeared unharmed and if she was being kidnapped, they had no idea.

Now Laughton has told a court that the Rangers confused their dates and that they had in fact helped him pick up a woman from that same hospital, but that it was in 1995 and not 1999, and that the woman was Mary not Betty, and that she was not being kidnapped but was a friend or a relative of a security guard who worked for Laughton.

Expect prosecutor Herman Broodryk to spend hours interrogating Laughton’s new alibi and his explanation of the hospital incident. Much of this will be make-or-break for the defence.

Laughton also spent much of his three days on the stand discrediting his former friends Conway Brown, Paul Toft-Nielsen and Dirk Reinecke. All three were arrested with him but took deals and gave evidence against him. He, in turn, has called them liars who implicated him only to save themselves.

Laughton has given the court a rare glimpse into his private life; from his failed marriages to his army medals, and from his investigations to his run-ins with the law (including his previous conviction for perjury).

He has painted his arrest as unlawful, attacking the way his house was searched and (quite ironically given his own career) the police’s use of private investigators.

Crucial to his case, he has also given great detail about his feud with former Cranks owner Eric Neeteson-Lemkes. Cranks is the popular Rosebank restaurant (now closed) where Ketani worked as a cook and the site of one of Laughton’s investigations.

He claims that Neeteson-Lemkes was a “bitter and twisted” man who accused him of wasting his money and of interfering in his family. Laughton briefly dated Eric’s daughter Monique. All this, he claims, led to a “campaign of terror” from Eric, which included Laughton being arrested on two separate occasions. Both cases were thrown out of court due to a lack of evidence. Laughton also believes Eric was behind a robbery at his house in 2001.

So the spine of Carrington’s defence is that the confession, which was found under a carpet at Brown’s old house, was another one of Eric’s attempts to have him thrown in jail.

Led by his advocate, Laurence Hodes, Laughton has gone through each and every sentence of the “confession”, picking up on spelling and grammar mistakes he claims he would never have made and highlighting other, more serious, discrepancies. He’s also gone through all of the statements made against him, again denying any wrongdoing. The idea here is probably to cast as much doubt as possible on the evidence as a whole. From the smallest spelling mistake (“Alexander” instead of “Alexandra”) to more fundamental differences in the versions given by the so-called “accomplice witnesses”.

In conclusion, Laughton has delivered a forceful denial of any involvement in any of the crimes the state has accused him of. He had waited almost three years to speak, and when he did he came across as the kind of witness most lawyers dream about. The kind of witness who can recall from memory what letter and number is assigned to a specific document in a thick police docket. But the real test is yet to come: cross-examination. Stay tuned…

The Trial Must Go On

April 28, 2015

Judgment in the “Section 174” applications has been delivered. You’ll recall the defense launched the applications as soon as the state closed its case, asking the court to set the three accused free.

In essence, lawyers for Carrington Laughton and his co-accused, Carel and David Ranger, argued that the state has failed to make out a case; that the chain of evidence is broken; the witnesses against them are unreliable (“pathetic” was a word used); and that the trial has not been fair.

Fighting back, prosecutors argued the chain of evidence is intact and that while the witnesses were not perfect, they corroborated each other on key aspects of the case and were not manipulated in any way. They reminded the court about the DNA evidence and the handwriting analysis and accused the defense of making “quantum leaps” of reasoning.

Judge Natvarial Ranchod took just a minute or two to deliver his ruling, having thought about the arguments over a long weekend. Laughton and the Ranger brothers each faced eight counts. The judge discharged Laughton on three of these (two were conspiracy charges and one related to an earlier kidnapping of Betty Ketani). He also swept aside all but two of the charges which the Rangers faced.

All three accused, however, still have to answer to the two main charges against them, namely the kidnapping and the murder of Betty Ketani.

And so the trial enters its final phase, where the defense presents its case. Three years after the discovery of the confession under the carpet and his arrest, Laughton has stepped into the witness box to tell his side of the story….

Follow the trial on: @alexeliseev

State Closes its Case

April 17, 2015

A major milestone has been reached: the state has finally finished presenting its case.

It’s taken more than sixty court days (and, with all the delays, over a year) for the trial to get to this point. Neither side can be blamed for the slow progress. This is a massively complex case involving a lot of circumstantial evidence. The state has had to call witnesses from overseas, present handwriting analysis and lead three volatile witnesses (Conway Brown, Paul Toft-Nielsen and Dirk Reinecke). As the trial progressed, the investigation led to new witnesses or fresh evidence, while the defence continued its relentless attack on every aspect of the case. This sometimes forced prosecutors to go out and do more work, slowing the trial down. The defence also drew the state into several technical, legal side-battles and, by refusing to make any admissions, left prosecutors with no choice but to call witness after witness to try and preserve the chain of evidence.

The last witness to be called by prosecutors Herman Broodryk and Namika Kowlas was policeman Mike Sales. You may recognise his name from the Oscar Pistorius trial. He’s a digital forensic analyst who pulls data from cellphones, computers and other gadgets. He was called to explain how information was lifted from Carrington Laughton’s cellphone, which was seized after his arrest. The defence had raised suspicions that the phone was tampered with and, once again, that the chain of custody was broken because the device was not handled properly by the police. In essence, Sales testified that Laughton’s phone was locked and they couldn’t access it until October 2012, when the data was finally retrieved. This, he argued, means there was no chance that anyone could have tampered with it beforehand. The defence had a go at the fact that Sales received the phone in an evidence bag that was not properly sealed. But the colonel, who has almost 40 years experience, spent only a few hours in the witness box and, ultimately, there is not that much (comparatively) that turns on the cellphone records.

Once Sales was done, Laughton’s advocate, Laurence Hodes, indicated that they were going for a Section 174 application to try and have at least two charges against him thrown out. The other two accused, David and Carel Ranger, are doing the same, but are challenging all of the counts they face. A Section 174 is an attempt by the defence to convince a court that the state has failed to prove its case and that there is no need to even offer a defence. By way of example, it’s the stage of the trial during which Shrien Dewani was set free.

It should take about a week, or a bit more, to go through this process. If the Section 174s fail, the defence will then open its case. In the absence of any special applications, the first order of business will be Laughton’s testimony (if he decides to take the stand). An accused must testify first, before other witnesses are summoned.

Three years after the confession was found and the arrests were made, I can’t wait to hear the defence’s side of the story. It’s going to get interesting.

Stress Lands Detective in Hospital – Case Delayed

Update – January 14, 2015

Captain Gerhard van Wyk was discharged from hospital and concluded his evidence in the first week of this year. He spent three days on the stand. In essence, he continued to defend his investigation while facing questions about the evidence he gathered, his methods and credibility (the defense made claims about events dating back more than 20 years). The case has been postponed to mid April.

December 8, 2014

For a while, it seemed like the #ColdCase trial was on track to finishing this year. More than two months were set aside for it to wrap up in what was effectively the third session (there had already been two postponements since the matter began in February). Despite fierce opposition from the defense, the state was working its way through its witnesses, pushing towards putting investigating officer, Gerhard Van Wyk, on the witness stand to pull all the evidence together.

Since the last update, prosecutors Herman Broodryk and Namika Kowlas were forced to bring Betty Ketani’s daughters up from the Eastern Cape to testify. There was a dispute from the defense about the whether all of her children had different fathers, an important issue for the DNA leg of the case. Bulelwa and Lusanda Ketani made the journey to Johannesburg.

After them came state forensic pathologist, Professor Gert Saayman, who had also testified in the Oscar Pistorius trial. His role was to give hypothetical evidence about Betty’s murder. The actual killing. Remember, the state argues she was stabbed with a steel knitting needle-like object (as per Conway Brown’s evidence). So Saayman testified about the human skull and what kind of damage such a weapon could do. He also took the court through how a body decomposes and whether Paul Toft-Nielsen’s evidence could be true (what was found in the shallow grave, how the skeleton was thrown away in a river, etc). The professor was a formidable witness, much like professor Thomas Parsons from the Bosnia laboratory. However, despite his knowledge and experience, his evidence is speculative because no post mortem was ever possible in this case. The body – save for a few feet bones – has never been found.

Next, the court heard a lot of medical evidence relating to Carrington Laughton’s first wife, who is mentioned in the hidden confession. For prosecutors, it was important to add this piece of the puzzle because the letter specifically mentions her suicide attempt in 1999 and the date it happened. The medical records, therefore, corroborate the confession and are another bit of circumstantial evidence. As always, there was a great deal of legal fighting over which documents were admissible and which were not. This drained entire days.


Midway through November, Captain Gerhard Van Wyk eventually took to the witness stand as the state’s last witness. He’s a crucial witness because as the investigating officer he was involved in every aspect of the case. He carried the docket, took statements and compiled all the evidence. It was always expected that he would spend a week or two in the hot seat. But, almost from the very beginning, it became clear that Van Wyk was not well. He complained of headaches and struggled to read exhibits. He was booked off for several days and eventually landed up in hospital. It was feared his stress had morphed into diabetes. In a case full of twists, the investigating officer being hospitalised for an “acute stress reaction”, and being booked off for a month, was low on the expectation radar.

Van Wyk had managed five days before the trial ground to a halt yet again. The defense complained and promised to launch a new bail application, given the lengthy postponement. The trial judge was asked to hear it but, after considering submissions from both sides, declined, saying a bail application would force him to make credibility findings, which would complicate things later down the road.

So as things stand, the trial will resume on January 5, 2015. But only for a week. This will hopefully be enough time for the state to close its case (once Van Wyk is cross-examined) and for the defense to launch their Section 174 application (which they will more than likely do). Then, the trial looks set to be postponed once more, this time to April. Why? Because the judge is away on leave and lawyers like Laurence Hodes are not available earlier, having pushed all their cases forward.

With four more months in custody, it’s hardly surprising that Laughton and the Ranger brothers (Carel and David) are talking about a new bail application. They will also argue that the state’s case is done, so they can’t interfere with it. Should a new bail battle break out, it will be fascinating to watch. Laughton and his co-accused have already been denied bail, appealed and lost and then tried again (on new grounds) but failed. A new attempt at this stage would, amongst other things, explore the strength of the state’s case.

The Section 174 application will be even more interesting. This is an application which asks the court whether the state’s case is strong enough for the defense to even open its case. Glenn Agliotti got off a murder charge on a Section 174. As did Shrien Dewani earlier today. In the Dewani case, the state’s case crumbled and the judge found that the only way the accused would ever be found guilty is if he incriminated himself while testifying. Judge Jeanette Traverso said that while she sympathized with Anni’s family, courts can’t allow emotions inside, or face the possibility of anarchy. She spoke of the evidence given by the state’s “accomplice” witnesses as a “garbled mess”, which is about as bad as it can get for a public prosecutor.

I would bet that the Dewani trial (along with others) features in Laurence Hodes’ Section 174 application, should it be made. And it surely will, even if the defense asks for some – not all – of the charges to be withdrawn. In the Ketani case, there are three 105A accomplice witnesses (Conway Brown, Paul Toft Nielsen and Dirk Reinecke) and a 204 witness (Andre Coetzer). All of these witnesses have serious credibility problems and have lied in the past. But the Ketani case is also different because there is handwriting evidence and forensic DNA evidence, which has been led by the state. In other words, the entire case does not rest on the evidence of the accomplices. So as I’ve said before, I would be surprised if a Section 174 succeeds in this case, but I will be watching it with interest.

To wrap up: There have now been 58 court days and 35 state witnesses. Which is an astonishingly long trial, considering the defense is yet to open its case.  Hopefully, this is the last major delay.

Until next month.

A Retired Cop, A Nurse and “Amazing” DNA Results…

November 2, 2014

The #ColdCase trial is finally picking up some speed and there’s a feeling the state is approaching the end of its case.

In coming weeks, we expect to hear from Betty Ketani’s daughters, renowned forensic pathologist, professor Gert Saayman (who testified in the Oscar Pistorius case) and lead detective Gerhard Van Wyk, who will spend days in the witness box. There may be a final surprise or two, but we’ll only know once we get there.

With the defence disputing absolutely everything, prosecutors are calling Betty’s daughters to testify about their parents. This is important for the DNA results, which came from Bosnia and were made extra difficult by the fact that all three children have different fathers (A person gets half their DNA from their father and half from their mother).

Professor Saayman will, more than likely, offer his opinion on how Betty was killed. Remember, there is no body so he will probably have to give hypothetical evidence about a person being stabbed in the head with a knitting needle-like spike (as per the evidence heard in this trial). As for investigating officer Gerhard Van Wyk, he will have to tie up all the loose ends and introduce any evidence which is yet to be presented to court. He’s a crucial state witness.

After that, there’s a chance the defence will bring an application to have the case thrown out (Section 174, in terms of the Criminal Procedure Act). This kind of application argues that the state has failed to make out a case. If this happens, it will be fiercely contested and I can’t see the court being easily persuaded. If the defence wins at that stage, the accused go free. If not, they open their case.

Since the last post, we’ve heard from Betty’s brother, Eric, who testified about the family structure. Then came police forensic expert Greg De Wet, who told the court about how the local laboratory was unable to extract any DNA from the bones that were found in the shallow grave. The bones were too old and degraded and he said it was “amazing” that the lab in Bosnia managed to get a trace of DNA from the samples that were sent there (Police say the six bones were split in half, with three staying in SA and three being shipped overseas). Advocate Laurence Hodes made it known they were going to attack the results of those tests (ICMP, in Bosnia), down to whether the chemicals that were used had expired. It’s going to be an interesting battle, given that the ICMP is an accredited, globally recognized laboratory with its experts testifying in war crimes tribunals at The Hague. I’m looking forward to how this plays out.

The court also heard from Ndaba Bhebe, who, like Themba Tshabalala, was one of the victims mentioned in the confession letter. He was abducted and tortured in 1999, opening a case at the time. These abductions are linked to the investigation at Cranks and, therefore, to the Ketani murder. Bhebe didn’t spend long on the stand and the only unusual twist was when the defence asked the court to inspect his eyes. This caused a moment of confusion, but it quickly emerged that the argument (which failed) was that his eyes are normally bloodshot and that the medical forms from 1999 may have been misleading about his injuries.

Rachel Dube has also testified. She worked with Betty at Cranks and was the last person to see her alive. She also gave an insight in the CCMA war that had erupted back in the day.

Finally, the court heard from a nurse who worked near the scene where Betty was allegedly stabbed (on the side of the R59 highway). This is a fascinating bit of circumstantial evidence introduced by the state. The idea is: Betty was last seen on May 20, 1999. On that same night, a police log book reflects this nurse calling in about a person being brought in with an injury and being driven to the Kopanong hospital. The nurse, Monafu Mphuting, worked at a small maternity clinic that did not have the ability to treat serious injuries. While Mphuting has no independent recollection of the events, she testified that she would not have called the police if she did not suspect a crime. On it’s own, it’s a long stretch. But prosecutors will hope it fits into the bigger picture. According to the confession, Kopanong Hospital is the place from which Betty was kidnapped by men pretending to be a medical transfer crew.

The trial continues.

Creative design from the South

Get in touch with us!